The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To describe the development and evaluation of the OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ) for somatic outpatients. DESIGN Literature review, patient interviews, pretesting of questionnaire items, and a cross sectional survey. SETTING Postal survey of adult outpatient clinics at 52 hospitals in all five regions of Norway during 2003 and 2004. SUBJECTS 35,719 patients who had attended an outpatient clinic within the previous 3 weeks. RESULTS 19,266 patients (53.9%) responded to the questionnaire. Low levels of missing data suggest that the questionnaire is acceptable to patients. Factor analysis of items applicable to all patients produced three factors: clinic access (two items), communication (six items), and organisation (four items). The remaining items contributed to the hypothesised scales of hospital standards (three items), information (six items), and pre-visit communication (three items). With the exception of the pre-visit communication scale, the levels of Cronbach's alpha were >0.7. With the exception of the hospital standards scale, all produced test-retest correlations that exceeded 0.7. Most of the results of validity testing were as hypothesised. Correlations between the OPEQ scores ranged from 0.30 (clinic access and hospital standards) to 0.73 (communication and information). As hypothesised, scores were significantly related to patient responses to questions about overall satisfaction, general health and age. CONCLUSIONS The OPEQ is a self-administered questionnaire that includes the most important aspects of patient experience from an outpatient perspective. It has good evidence for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity.
منابع مشابه
The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective
OBJECTIVES Patient experience questionnaires have been criticised owing to the lack of supporting psychometric evidence. The objective of this study was to describe the development and psychometric evaluation of the Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ) in Norway. DESIGN Questionnaire development was based on a literature review of existing questionnaires, patient interviews, expert...
متن کاملThe NORPEQ patient experiences questionnaire: data quality, internal consistency and validity following a Norwegian inpatient survey.
AIMS This article describes the development of a questionnaire designed for comparisons of patient experiences of hospital care within the Nordic countries. The results of testing for data quality, reliability, and validity are presented following a Norwegian survey. METHODS Following a literature review and consultation within an expert group six items were developed measuring patient experi...
متن کاملDevelopment and validity of the questionnaire of patients' experiences in postacute outpatient physical therapy settings.
BACKGROUND Patient feedback surveys are increasingly seen as a key component of health care quality monitoring and improvement. OBJECTIVE The study objective was to describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a fixed-length questionnaire about the experiences of patients receiving physical therapist treatment in postacute outpatient settings. DESIGN This was an instrumen...
متن کاملتعیین ابعاد و گویه های کیفیت خدمات سرپایی در بیمارستان های اهواز
Background and Aim: Assessing service quality is one of the basic requirements to develop outpatient service. There is no valid and reliable tool to measure quality of outpatient service, therefore this study was performed to determine dimensions and items for assessing service quality of outpatient in Iran. Materials and Methods: To determine dimensions and items of the outpatient service qua...
متن کاملThe Prostate Care Questionnaire for Carers (PCQ-C): reliability, validity and acceptability
BACKGROUND Patient experience is commonly monitored in evaluating and improving health care, but the experience of carers (partners/relatives/friends) is rarely monitored even though the role of carers can often be substantial. For carers to fulfil their role it is necessary to address their needs. This paper describes an evaluation of the reliability, validity and acceptability of the PCQ-C, a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Quality & safety in health care
دوره 14 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005